I had the good fortune of having one of the junior players from my club in Saint Louis reach out to me. We had a frank discussion on Facebook and on Messenger about the state of junior volleyball, as she saw it. I promised her I would address some of her concerns and thoughts.
I did both Volleyball and Track, which are not a very
common combination of two sports in
college. Volleyball and track are very comparable to each other and different
seasons (fall versus spring). In high school I did volleyball, basketball, and
track and by my junior year, I quit basketball because of club volleyball. I
find myself completely saddened by how athletics have changed. Some things
might be better, but a lot are so sad. Kids at a very young age choose their
one sport and stick to it. You don’t find many multiple sport athletes. Or
clubs allowing other sports to occur. Now having children of my own, I want to
allow them to do many sports.
….the same body repetition leads to early injuries, and not to mention burnout. Some clubs like travel soccer don’t allow the athletes to even play on their high school team, it is 100% club or nothing. It’s just sad to me. I was a well-rounded athlete in multiple sports, I just wish it wasn’t about the money but now it truly is. Not only the clubs making money, but now it’s the college athletes making money, which is even more of a driver to being a one sport athlete. All around sad.
It’s a tough
topic. I see both sides. Specializing in a sport and being the best in that
sport versus being a well-rounded athlete. I was great at both sports, but I
couldn’t give track a fair enough shot while doing volleyball. So, parts of me
wishes I did pick one or the other. Multiple sport athletes are well rounded
and help with overuse and repetition. But now with players being able to make
money as soon as they get into college. It makes you want to specialize, but I
feel like the sport is changing and makes me sad. I would have loved the portal
to transfer, and I probably would have, but I chose the university I chose so I
could do both sports which many other schools had said no to. There are so many
variables and factors. Just makes me sad for my kids playing sports now. Where
is the love for the game instead of the business/money aspect?
It is, indeed, a very tough question. Even
though her perspective is not surprising for those dinosaurs like myself who
have been around club volleyball for so many decades, I believe the most recent
changes are the most salient. Club sports for juniors in general has burgeoned
to the point where specialization and year-round sports seasons have become
seemingly inevitable, even as many clubs and club coaches are diligently repeating the mantra of
the value of the multi-sport athletic experience, especially for the young
players starting in sports; yet many are also lamenting the fact that they
don’t have the athletes full time for volleyball training because of their
other interests. Indeed, many clubs are leveraging the year-round volleyball
experience for increased revenue opportunities. High schools are also jumping
into the fray, not wanting to lose ground to the clubs. The result is not just
year-round volleyball but multiple periods of overlapping athletic activities,
which can lead to harm, physically and mentally.
In many ways, we are victims of our own
success. As more players are aspiring to move onto the collegiate stage, the
rush to recruitment has made the large convention center tournaments and
college showcases the norm. In the earlier days, clubs and coaches, in an
effort to entice the parents and families to spend more money, evolved the
central purpose of club volleyball from skill development to college
recruitment. A narrative was evolved to convince everyone involved that the larger,
and longer club experience was the only way to ensure that the players ended up
playing in college, dangling that college scholarship as the carrot.
As it turns out, the clubs were
preaching to the choir. No one needed to try very hard to convince the parents.
Even though, a simple calculation would show that the investment made in junior
sports development is better spent being
invested in college funds; a more stable and better outcome than hoping for a
scholarship. Even with the numbers staring them in the face, many parents eagerly
invest in their progeny’s success in sports with the college scholarships as
the center of the attraction.
But that couldn’t explain the number of
families paying for club sports. While many
parents are realistic about their progeny’s potential as a college athlete,
they see many other reasons for participating in club sports; all the traditional
reasons: teamwork, ability to work with others, the sheer satisfaction of
accomplishing goals, improved confidence, learning about leadership,
self-sacrifice for the greater good, etc. But, because the focus and raison
d'etre for club sports has shifted
to the scholarship angle, the accepted wisdom has become: play large convention
center tournaments; play as many of these tournaments as possible; train
players for better tournament performances,
sometimes at the expense of improving their skills; and finally, insisting that
the players specialize on one sport at a very early age, before their bodies
have fully developed and while dropping all other sports, indeed all other
activities. It is the tail wagging the
dog when we compare it to the original purpose of club sports: to improve
player skills during their high school off-season in preparation for competing
in high school. Even as I am lamenting this evolution, I am not so naïve as to
think that we can reverse that trend, the horse is out of the barn, it is too
late. I am also not hypocritical enough
to say that I don’t enjoy the large convention center tournaments, they are
very useful and exciting. The talent levels does flow towards the correct
level, but it has been my experience that it usually take two or more days of
play out of the multiple day tournaments for most teams to settle into their
level of competition. In the meantime, the top-level teams are not challenged
during the first few days, while the lower level teams are getting pounded into
oblivion. There is certainly great value in playing better opponents, but the
benefit comes from being able to compete against those opponents,. There is no
benefit in losing by scoring in the single digits, especially with
inexperienced players. The sport suffers because we lose players’ interest.
The positive consequences are that we
are getting better players that are excellent advanced players because they are
exposed to better competition and are highly trained to compete and win. The
negative consequences are that they are coerced into being focused on just one
sport, denying themselves opportunities for other sports and other activities. We
are creating a general populace of future adults that are less well-rounded,
who are hyper focused on one chosen activity and are unable to understand that
there is more to being a well-rounded human than being great at one sport or
activity.
Unfortunately, most of the junior athletes
are stuck on this merry-go-round because they have no choice in the matter, the
goals of training are created by adults, adults who are ostensibly motivated by
what is best for the athlete. As the state of junior level sports evolves, the
emphasis will be on those who are looking for college playing opportunities,
which also means more large convention center events and showcases, less single
day events or local events. As it is, my clubs’ regional and local level teams
are having to scramble to play enough tournaments to fill their desired playing
opportunities. The small and local tournaments cannot compete with the big
tournaments, so the regional teams have to look forward to playing competitive
matches after the first few days. Coaches and clubs who field regional and local
level teams will, more likely than not, subtly apply peer pressure on the players
to convince them to specialize at a much earlier point in their lives than
before, it is a reflexive move, what is good for the goose is also good for the
gander. Increased scheduling conflicts between high schools and clubs drives
the schools and clubs to compete for the players’ time, with neither side
giving because they are fighting for “their” players. An inevitable result is rising
incidences of overuse injury and possibly burnout.
This is why we see so much attrition at
the 18 and under level. At this level, many have decided one way or another.
The great pipeline that fed the junior sports slows down to a trickle at the 18’s level, which hurts volleyball because
there is now a break in the continuum of playing. Those that stop playing at 18
may or may not return to their sports when they go to college, some will just
walk away, defeating our intention: growing the volleyball habit into a
lifelong sport. It is my impression that the adult membership in the USAV has
dropped precipitously in every season that I have been involved with junior
volleyball, even as there are large number of junior players feeding into the system. I don’t
have any data about the number of former club players playing in college
intramurals, college club teams, or in rec leagues, I would guess that the attrition
rate is considerable, i.e. the difference in the junior club membership during
the 16’s level, which is the highest number of memberships the last time I
checked, and the number of new adult memberships six years hence would be an
interesting and imperfect gauge.
In view of the most recent development
of large businesses purchasing the large volleyball clubs and plans to host
massive convention center tournaments, my imperfect extrapolation is that the interests
of the regional and local teams will erode even further, until junior
volleyball will become ever more upper rather than just middle class.
Another, more subtle yet persistent message
for developing junior players and future human adults is that putting your best
effort into any activity is to be the best, whether they are capable of “the
best” or not. A commitment to an activity is only validated by becoming the
very best, no matter the level of the player’s ability. If the player does not
measure up, then they should find something else to invest their time and effort
in; it doesn’t matter how they feel about the activity: if you cannot play for
the national team then you are wasting your time, try something else. The idea
of doing something for the sake of self-improvement, no matter the outcome, is
what dies in that persistent and pernicious belief.
There is an often-told story by the
author Kurt Vonnegut.
When I was 15, I spent a month
working on an archeological dig. I was talking to one of the archeologists one
day during our lunch break and he asked those kinds of “getting to know you “
questions you ask young people: Do you play sports? What’s your favorite
subject? And I told him, no I didn’t play any sport. I do theater, I’m in
choir, I play the violin and piano, I used to take art classes.
And he went WOW. That’s amazing!
And I said, “Oh no, but I’m not any good at ANY of them.”
And he said something that I
will never forget, and which absolutely blew my mind because no one had ever
said anything like it to me before: “I don’t think being good at things is the
point of doing them. I think you’ve got all these wonderful experiences with
different skills, and that all teaches you things and makes you an interesting
person, no matter how well you do them.”
And that honestly changed my
life. Because I went from a failure, someone who hadn’t been talented enough at
anything to excel, to someone who did things because I enjoyed them. I had been
raised in such an achievement-oriented environment, so inundated with the myth
of Talent, that I thought it was only worth doing things if you could “win” at
them.”
What did that story have to do with sports specialization?
I am and was a horrible athlete. I was short,
uncoordinated, and overweight. I somehow fell in love with volleyball, I tried
to play club volleyball in gradual school. I was the third setter on the second
team or the second setter on the third team, I don’t remember. They let me play
because I was older and could procure the post-tournament celebratory
libations. I played, no matter that I knew I was going to lose and often
humiliate myself, but I didn’t care. Most of the people I played with didn’t
care, we loved the game and we played. Later, as a means of making myself a
better player, I turned to coaching, and I fell in love with coaching
volleyball. There is some kind of perverse masochism intrinsic in me that
drives me to pedagogy.
While I was evolving as a coach and as a
teacher, the experience that I gained through coaching, and the myriad other
parts of my multifaceted life has served me well. The cumulative experiences I garnered
while just trying things out and performing at not at a very high level has
enriched my life. My experiences with volleyball have benefitted my endeavors
in other things, and vice versa. It has made me who I am.
In our insistence to service the adult desires in sustaining
an economical system called junior volleyball we are influencing junior players
to specialize both directly and indirectly. In so doing, we are depriving them
of the chance to accumulate experiences that nurture their generalist nature, a
nature that is vital for the development of future adult human beings.
In the end, I am not sure if I was able to answer my former
player’s concerns about her young children, but I am pleased that she sees the
situation, one that she was once a part of, with clear eyes and discerning
judgement. I hope that she can successfully navigate the very complicated, ever
changing, and turbulent seas of junior volleyball with her children, just as
she had in a bygone era.