Volleyball Fan’s Life-The VNL

I was finally persuaded to invest in a Volleyball World account to watch the VNL. I am kicking myself for not having done so earlier. I logged in to the various volleyball groups in the virtual world after the match against Türkiye to see what others had to say. It was, I must say, amusing and disconcerting at the same time.

So here is some history and some realities for the sake of context.

Volleyball Nations League was inaugurated in 2018. It is a revamping of the World League and World Grand Prix, both of which are tournaments put on by the FIVB for the top teams in the world. The VNL replaced the World Grand Prix. These tournaments take place every year except for Olympic years. They charge big bucks to each nation who want to participate but also payoff in big bucks for those finishing atop the league.

One thing to remember is that the Olympic sports places the premium on the Olympics, all the other tournaments are ways to build up to the Olympic competition. Cycle time is four years, just as the Soccer World Cup, International basketball, and any other sport whose biggest competition is the Olympics. Unlike the popular sports that we follow in the US, where there is a payoff and champion every year. The VNL is NOT the be all and end all for international volleyball. None of these countries would play to lose, it costs too much. But the impetus is much different.

Looking from the athletes’ point of view, they are playing overseas in a single year cycle so that they can distinguish themselves for the national team on the four-year cycle. Playing professionally overseas is very trying: physically and emotionally.  There are injuries, home sickness, language, and culture issues etc. Why do it? Some thrive on the adventure of the experience while others do it because they know this is the only way they can get experience in  the international game while playing against the best competition, all done to enhance their chances at making the team every quad.  The schedule though, works against them. The players need to rush home after their pro season is over to practice in the national team gym for a very short time, then it is off to four weeks of playing and traveling. This year Hentz and Hancock were the only two that went on all four legs of the VNL. Others were on and off the rosters as the weeks rolled by.

The reason for that musical roster is because they have to give the veteran players time off to heal and to rest from their professional seasons. But there is also a broader and more long term focused purpose. The national team roster is ever evolving, even though most fans get fixated on the roster each week of the VNL as their focus. Coaches are dealing with a fluid roster. Karch said that he considers all 24 on the training roster members of the national team after the USA won the gold. He is not just being kind; it is a reality. The selection of the final Olympic roster is an arduous and emotional experience for everyone involved. More on that later.

All the countries who are contenders for the Olympic title treat the VNL in various contexts: as a competition, as a period of assessment, and most importantly, as a laboratory to experiment with everything — tactics, strategy, players, player interaction, team makeup, individual and team ability to withstand game pressure and being able to make good decisions under game pressure. They don’t pretend that winning the VNL is the ultimate prize for the national team. Winning is important, but it is not the most important. The most important thing is to learn about the disparate parts: players, coaches, and staff; the humans involved and figuring out ways to melding them into a team.

The coaching staffs needs to know about how much the veterans have left in their batteries, whether they are performing up to the highest of international standards, their ability to make the best decisions under pressure, and whether they are still as motivated as they were from the last quad. They also need to know where the young players are at: how the pipeline of players are developing, whether they are playing overseas or are in college. The international game is very different and much more demanding, physically, emotionally, and mentally than the collegiate game. Competing against wily veterans from other countries, even the non-competitive countries in the international scene, is not the same as competing with other 18 to 22-year-olds. International coaches leverage the changing rosters for the VNL to work groups of young players in and out of their roster decision every two weeks to not only expose the young players to the level of play but to also observe how well the young players mesh with the veterans and how they are able to “solve problems” as Karch noted in the comments between sets against Türkiye. Digging into the granularities, coaches will want to know which players play better together, which players seem to not do well when on the court with one another. The coaches need to be the alchemists of team chemistry.  Coaches also need to let the players play themselves into and out of trouble. I see many comments about the coaches being too slow with the subs. I believe that this is deliberate, they want to see whether the veterans have lost their edge and whether the young players have learned to develop that edge. This is the time for the coaching staffs to be patient and experimental, not during the Olympics.

There are many countries who treat the World Grand Prix and now the VNL in a very controlled manner, many will only send the next level of players, to get them seasoning. They will also play a plain vanilla game, not showing any of their new strategies, preferring to save them for the Olympics. Partly to play a cat and mouse game, partly to lull the opposing team’s scout into thinking that this is all there is. I am not sure how much of that is going on right now, but that was the way it was.

The decisions for the USA women’s team is made particularly difficult because the USA has never won a gold medal in the Olympics until the last quad. The reason for that is convoluted and complex. I wrote about it in one of my other blogs immediately after the gold medal match. (https://polymathtobe.blogspot.com/2021/08/an-appreciation-of-karch-kiraly.html) I have been a fan since the 1980 team, and quad after quad, I was disappointed. The USA team is the illustration of the adage: “Men battle to bond, and women bond to battle.”  The difference with the gold medal winning team and Karch as head coach is that he pays attention to the relationships, building trust, convincing the players to work on themselves, their relationships with one another, and their own altruistic motivations when playing with the national team. In order to have a roster of 14 players who can step in when needed, they must be unselfish about their roles. The coaches need to put the players through the gauntlet so that they have knowledge of their players when it comes time to actually pick the members of the squad, and work with them to help resolve issues. As alluded to before, the selection is for the last pre-Olympic roster and not just the final Olympics roster.  There must also be trust between those that made the final Olympic roster and those that did not, the coaching staff need to make sure that everyone on the pre-Olympic roster is 100% on board with the Olympic team, no petty jealousies, no selfish petulance, nothing that would detract from the drive to the gold.

This is not something that all other national teams go through, and some may say that this is just another case paralysis by analysis, but we have one gold medal to show for this method and 40 years of frustrations otherwise.

I wanted to put all that context out there for everyone’s consideration. To call attention to the fact that what we are seeing in the final weekend of VNL competition, or for the month of VNL competition is just a snapshot in time of the very large national team roster as we know it, a year away from the actual Olympics. There are many players with many different levels of experience, physical shape, emotional welfare, and maturity levels. Each member of that expanded roster will have individual and collective interactions and couplings with one another, some tenable and some not. The coaching staff will have to sort through all of that, the VNL is their testing ground, their sandbox to play in so that they have all that information. Of course, the process is imperfect, but when they, the coaching staff, make the decisions, they need to have as much information based on different scenarios on the actions and reactions of the team to reference, if that means being patient with players when they are on court so be it, you don’t learn much about how they will play if they are on the bench.

It is a marathon folks, not a sprint.

Book Review-Have You Eaten Yet? By Cheuk Kwan

I don’t remember how I became aware of this book, but once I saw what it was about, I knew I was going to read it, it was just a matter of when. The subject hit me right in the middle of my soul. Being one of the large number of people who make up the Chinese diaspora, I knew I would love the stories about how the overseas Chinese survived leaving their home, move thousands of miles away, endure discrimination, abuse in many cases, and yet thrive. Of course the author also added the Chinese food perspective into his book, which made it impossible to ignore.

Cheuk Kwan is a documentary maker who, like many of us of the Chinese diaspora, had lived in many countries outside of China, Taiwan, or Hong Kong. I am enjoying watching the video stories that follow each chapter of the book on YouTube. I only became aware of the videos after I started reading the book. But this is more than just another travel show that features food. It speaks to my sentimental side, as the stories remind me of my own travels around the world. As with most Chinese people, we will eat at a local Chinese place at least once no matter where we are. It doesn’t matter if the food is authentic or not, it is a taste of home, it is a way to spend time with people who look like I do. It goes beyond finding a place of comfort and familiarity in a foreign land, it is something ethereal and sentimental.

I grew up in Taiwan, Honduras, and the United States, so my experience is not as broad ranging as Cheuk Kwan’s, but the feelings are there. I played with the children of the Chinese restaurant owners, and they were my friends because we sought each other out because we shared a heritage.

There are 15 disparate and unique places where Kwan and his crew visited, looking for the stories and story tellers within each nation and culture. In each of the chapters Kwan frames the narrative by introducing us to the main subjects that he had chosen for each location, using their stories to illustrate the hardships that they and their ancestors had endured to arrive at a particular geographical location. He deftly weaves the stories together, coupling the culture and society where he is visiting with the Chinese experience. The intermingling works most of the time, the key is that he was able to show the readers the uniqueness of each location through projecting the Chinese experience on the local culture. This is not an easy task; I would say that for the most part Mr. Kwan succeeded.

As he assumed the storyteller role, he led us through his own journey and revealed his own inner feelings about the people he was interviewing. His introduction of his crew in each chapter gave us a point of commonality which revealed a perspective that serves as a reference point.

The added bonus of talking about the kind of Chinese food that is served in each location also served to show perspective, about the ingenuity of the Chinese cooks as they learned to live in the US Marines motto: adapt, improvise, and overcome. His descriptions of the dishes gave me a true view of what “fusion” cuisine can really mean. It is only proper that he told the story of the Chinese diaspora through the lens of our food, as the book title indicates, the most common refrain when the Chinese get together is: “How You Eaten Yet?” If not, let us go eat, let us socialize, let us be good humans, and let us be even better Chinese people. Even if you have already eaten, if doesn’t stop us from eating some more, not because of the food itself, but because of who we are and what we mean to one another.

The combination of travelogue and food writing is not new. My first exposure was through the work of Anthony Bourdain, perhaps the originator of this style of storytelling. Another exemplary book that captured my imagination through the tales of travel and food is Chef Edward Lee’s Buttermilk Graffiti (https://polymathtobe.blogspot.com/2019/05/book-review-buttermilk-graffiti-by.html)

I would put this book in that pantheon of travelogue and food writing because this one hits very close to home. Even though I had never been to most of the places Kwan had visited, the stories and experiences that he captured resonates deeply in my Chinese heart.

Kwan asks the same question of every person he interviews: How do you think of yourself, as a Chinese person or a local? He received many different replies, I would say that most of the people interviewed thought of themselves as Chinese, or at least a part of their identity is Chinese because our looks standout amongst all the countries. But I want to think that it is our Chinese identity that we always go up the strangers and ask: Have You Eaten Yet?